Comments on: Social engineering watch http://bjhess.com/blog/2006/05/22/social-engineering-watch/ Barry Hess, speaking in tongues. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:09:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: bjhess http://bjhess.com/blog/2006/05/22/social-engineering-watch/#comment-2100 bjhess Wed, 24 May 2006 14:03:38 +0000 http://bjhess.com/bjhessblog/?p=824#comment-2100 Yeah - it doesn't really surprise me that such a law was on the books. It does surprise me that when it was presented for modernization, the body voting rejected the common-sense updates. But at least people in committed gay relationships can't get married. (Really, this shows how those that want to control our lives wish to legislate every "moral" choice they can think of - not simply the things that even relatively intelligent thinkers can get behind.) Yeah - it doesn’t really surprise me that such a law was on the books. It does surprise me that when it was presented for modernization, the body voting rejected the common-sense updates.

But at least people in committed gay relationships can’t get married. (Really, this shows how those that want to control our lives wish to legislate every “moral” choice they can think of - not simply the things that even relatively intelligent thinkers can get behind.)

]]> By: Todd http://bjhess.com/blog/2006/05/22/social-engineering-watch/#comment-2099 Todd Wed, 24 May 2006 12:02:58 +0000 http://bjhess.com/bjhessblog/?p=824#comment-2099 Perhaps this will promt those people living in sin to hurry up and get married (that always ends well). The exclusion of the "foster care relationship" is a bit odd. This implies that a family could not legally foster more than one child at a time. I don't follow the logic here. Perhaps this will promt those people living in sin to hurry up and get married (that always ends well).

The exclusion of the “foster care relationship” is a bit odd. This implies that a family could not legally foster more than one child at a time. I don’t follow the logic here.

]]>